So, why was I unhappy as a Mormon if I defined happiness in the same way? What has enabled me to achieve happiness outside the LDS Church, rather than within it?
When church teachings were combined with my personality, I ended up restricted in the following ways:
1) I felt limited in my opportunities to love.
Looking back, I see two main areas in which this was an issue.
- I felt a sense of duty to be a giver and not a taker. I think this inhibited my ability to achieve true intimacy (both platonic as well as romantic).
- I felt limited by my role as a woman. Although I tried to be attractive (in every sense of the word), tried to put myself "out there," and even asked guys out occasionally, I felt it was inappropriate to actively seek after the kind of romantic relationship I desired (and subtlety was NOT my game either).
2) I felt limited in my opportunity to live with purpose.
As I understood it, my purpose in life was to prepare for motherhood, find my eternal companion, and raise children to the Lord. Preparing for motherhood was no problem, but I felt powerless to fulfill the rest of my purpose and found it difficult to feel satisfied in the meantime. I felt like the clock (and my personality) was against me.
3) I felt that it was more important to be true to ideals than to myself.
It was not until my mission that I truly began to sense cognitive dissonance, or internal disagreement with what I had been taught to believe. For the next several years, I continued to conform but felt less and less emotionally connected to/convinced of the rightness of the teachings I had spent my life conforming to.
Through counseling, I became empowered to let go of shoulds. I began to tear down my emotional walls, to seek after the kind of relationships I wanted (regardless of what anyone else thought), and to truly live with integrity (that is, I began to see the superiority of following an internal rather than external moral code).
I learned for myself that happiness comes through principle, and not through context. That is how I know that it is not the state of "being Mormon" that makes some people good, and others bad. That is how I know it is not sexual orientation or a wedding which makes love and sex appropriate or not. That is how I know that things like alcohol and pornography are not self-destructive in and of themselves (it is how/why they are used).
The most astounding thing to me about the journey has been how difficult it is for others to relate the post-Mormon me with the Mormon me. In most ways, I am the same person I have always been. What has changed is my devotion to "the box," or one proposed model for the context of happiness.
3 comments:
I like this.
(At this moment, I am wish blogger had a like button... I wanted you to know I like this, but I have nothing smart to say.)
Thank you!! :)
Excellent points. After all, isn't being happy what life's all about no matter what religion one belongs to? The problem that the church has is that it wants to claim a monopoly on happiness and, even then, if one isn't happy blindly following the dictates of the church, then it must always be the person's fault and not the church's.
However, there are plenty of things where the church falls short on lately:
* The leaders are out of touch with the spiritual needs of the members. Why? Because the GAs don't receive revelation and rely on common-sense blanket statements to make them look inspired.
* Various demographics are shunned. Why are young single adults going inactive? Mainly because they feel like they've "failed" at life if they aren't married by the age of 30, and singles over the age of 30 may as well not exist in the eyes of many leaders.
* Advocating blind obedience in imperfect leaders does not for faithful relationships with Jesus Christ make.
Post a Comment